Journal Publications
A Public Dataset of Annotated Orcinus orca Acoustic Signals for Detection and Ecotype Classification (PDF)
Palmer, K.J., E. Cummings, M.G. Dowd, K. Frasier, F. Frazao, A. Harris, A. Houweling, J. Kanes, O.S. Kirsebom, H. Klinck, H. LeBlond, L. Laturnus, C. Matkin, O. Murphy, H. Myers, D. Olsen, C. O’Neill, B. Padovese, J. Pilkington, L. Quayle, A.R. Vuibert, K. Trounce, S. Vagle, S. Veirs, V. Veirs, J. Wladichuk, J. Wood, T. Yack, H. Yurk, and R. Joy
Scientific Data 12(1): 1137 (2025)
Palmer, K.J., E. Cummings, M.G. Dowd, K. Frasier, F. Frazao, A. Harris, A. Houweling, J. Kanes, O.S. Kirsebom, H. Klinck, H. LeBlond, L. Laturnus, C. Matkin, O. Murphy, H. Myers, D. Olsen, C. O’Neill, B. Padovese, J. Pilkington, L. Quayle, A.R. Vuibert, K. Trounce, S. Vagle, S. Veirs, V. Veirs, J. Wladichuk, J. Wood, T. Yack, H. Yurk, and R. Joy
Scientific Data 12(1): 1137 (2025)
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-025-05281-5
Killer whales (Orcinus orca) exhibit significant ecological and genetic diversity, with three primary sympatric populations in the Northeast Pacific: Resident, Bigg’s (Transient), and Offshore. Each population is characterized by distinct foraging habits, social structures, and vocal repertoires, which complicate accurate monitoring and conservation efforts. This dataset, compiled from diverse sources, provides a comprehensive resource for the detection and classification of killer whale vocalizations. The dataset includes annotated acoustic recordings spanning 11 years from various locations in Alaska, British Columbia, and Washington, collected using multiple hydrophone systems. It addresses the challenge of differentiating killer whale calls from other marine species and environmental noise, including specific instances of confounding signals that may help enhance model robustness. Detailed annotations capture a diverse suite of vocalizations and their associated metadata, facilitating the development of advanced machine learning models for ecological monitoring. This curated dataset aims to improve the accuracy of killer whale detection algorithms, support conservation efforts, and advance our understanding of killer whale acoustic communication across different populations.
North Atlantic Right Whale Up-call Localization with a Four-Element Acoustic Array on a Slocum Glider (PDF)
Martin, S.B. and M. Siderius.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 159(1): 300–314 (2026)
MacGillivray, M., M.L. Seto, S.B. Martin, and L. Bolt
UACE2025
North Atlantic right whales (NARW) are critically endangered, with an estimated 350individuals remaining. Passive acoustic monitoring offers a means to localize the whales, improving the accuracy of exclusion zones to mitigate vessel strikes and fishing entangle ments. This study evaluates multiple time-difference-of-arrival azimuth estimation meth ods for a compact volumetric array (CVA) integrated onto a Slocum glider. The methods tested include minimum difference estimation, k-means clustering, kernel density estimation (KDE), TDoA maximum likelihood estimation, and azigram-KDE estimation. Simulations in a ROS/Gazebo environment, incorporating realistic underwater acoustic conditions, are used to test each of the methods. Verification was achieved with an in-water trial off the coast of Clam Harbour, Nova Scotia, Canada (2024). The NARW upcall is emulated using a moored source producing linear frequency modulated pulses. The trial revealed that the azigram-KDE estimator performed the best, yielding a mean absolute error of 25.6◦ (20.5 % improvement over next best method) and an interquartile range of 10.2◦ (40.7 % improve ment). Successful localization of NARWs with a glider-mounted CVA advances autonomous marine mammal monitoring and supports ongoing conservation efforts.
Ocean soundscapes and trends from 2003 to 2021: 10–100 Hz
Ainslie, M.A., S.P. Robinson, P.M. Harris, P.L. Tyack, M.B. Halvorsen, S.-H. Cheong, V. Livina, and L.-S. Wang
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 157, 4358–4384 (2025)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0036831
Ainslie, M.A., S.P. Robinson, P.M. Harris, P.L. Tyack, M.B. Halvorsen, S.-H. Cheong, V. Livina, and L.-S. Wang
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 157, 4358–4384 (2025)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0036831
We analyze ocean ambient sound from a global network of hydrophones installed and maintained by the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization. We process acoustic data from nine hydrophones across six hydroacoustic stations distributed across five oceans: North Pacific, South Pacific, South Atlantic, Indian, and Southern oceans, for up to 19 consecutive years between 2003 and 2021. We identify dominant natural and anthropogenic sources for all six stations and observe long-term trends at four of them. Out of 20 statistical tests, 15 identified a significant downward trend in sound pressure level. Possible causes of these decreasing trends include a global recession in 2016, the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, five major earthquakes between 2004 and 2012 (with none in 2013–2021), and a steadily increasing sea surface temperature, which decreases the sea surface critical angle and hence the contribution from near-surface sources (e.g., shipping) to sound pressure level.
Examining the effect of intensive seismic surveys on abundance and behaviour of groundfish species along a continental slope of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
Martin, S.B. and M. Siderius.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 159(1): 300–314 (2026)
Nguyen, K., J.M. Hanlon, S.B. Martin, P. Borys, D. Schornagel, and C.J. Morris
Marine Pollution Bulletin 215: 117889
DOI:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.117889
This study investigated changes in the abundance and behaviour of groundfish species at a relatively deep-water site along the eastern continental slope of Canada, when exposed to a commercial seismic survey that lasted 100 consecutive days. Baited cameras were deployed at control and impact sites, before and after seismic exposure, consisting of 323, 5-h long, videos. Changes in abundance were not explained by seismic surveying noise for any of the five commonly observed fish species. However, Atlantic cod were found to have significantly longer arrival-times to baited camera stations and it took longer for available bait to be consumed immediately after seismic surveying occurred. This effect occurred when fish were exposed to a daily mean sound pressure level >120 dB re 1 μPa2 prior to the experimental measurements. The study contributes towards a better ecological understating of noise-related impacts over a wide range of conditions where groundfish occur.
Long-range propagation of airgun-array signals: Comparing numerical simulations and acoustic recordings in the Ionian sea (PDF)
Affatati, A., F. Pace, M.A. Wood, S. Viola, B.M.P. Galante, V. Sciacca, C. Ducatel, M. Laigle, G. Riccobene, D. Embriaco, F. Simeone, G. Marinaro, F. Romanelli, R. Racca, A. Camerlenghi.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 157, 2857–2867 (2025)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0036457
Affatati, A., F. Pace, M.A. Wood, S. Viola, B.M.P. Galante, V. Sciacca, C. Ducatel, M. Laigle, G. Riccobene, D. Embriaco, F. Simeone, G. Marinaro, F. Romanelli, R. Racca, A. Camerlenghi.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 157, 2857–2867 (2025)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0036457
Marine seismic surveys contribute to acoustic pollution, and the sounds they produce may be audible by marine mammals at several hundred kilometers distance. To evaluate the potential effects of such sounds on fauna and translate them into effective policies and mitigation measures, stakeholders require quantitative estimations of acoustic fields. We compare simulations of airgun-array signals produced during the Upper LIthosphere Ship Subduction Exploration survey in the Ionian Sea with the signals recorded 650 kilometers away at the cabled seabed observatory NEMO-SN1. JASCO's Applied Sciences' Airgun Array Source Model was used to predict the sound levels for two configurations of 18-element airguns, and the signal was then propagated in a realistic environment utilizing JASCO's Full-Waveform Range dependent Acoustic Model from the source to the position of the receiver station. There is a qualitative agreement between the simulated, denoised, and recorded signals of the airgun arrivals. However, the signal simulated at 650 kilometers from the source stretches and shows fewer high-frequency components compared to the received one. Our study quantitatively shows that the peaks produced by a large airgun array during a scientific cruise, at 160–180 Hz are not masked by ambient noise even in busy shipping locations at a distance of 650 km.
Measuring vessel source level in shallow water using the smoothed semi-coherent image method
Yubero, R., C.A.F. de Jong, M.A. Ainslie, A.O. MacGillivray, and L. Wang.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 157(3): 1938–1954 (2025)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0036140
Yubero, R., C.A.F. de Jong, M.A. Ainslie, A.O. MacGillivray, and L. Wang.
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 157(3): 1938–1954 (2025)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0036140
Standardizing the process for measuring underwater sound generated by ships in shallow waters is a complex challenge currently under development. Recent progress has enabled the development of analytical formulations to represent propagation conditions underwater using propagation loss (PL) approximations, which are employed to derive the source level (SL) from ship sound pressure level (SPL) measurements. Underwater radiated noise (URN) tests conducted in the SATURN project enabled a detailed evaluation of the seabed critical angle (SCA) method, recommended by an early draft of the ongoing ISO 17208-3 standard, identifying a general underestimation of SL above ∼500 Hz compared to measurements under equivalent operating conditions in deep water, as described by ISO 17208-1. This article presents an alternative smoothed semi-coherent image (SSCI) method for calculating PL (and hence SL) and assesses the method's performance through analytical and empirical scenarios (including recordings of three different instrumentation deployment strategies at four distinct depths and four test distances). The SSCI method enhances accuracy over a broad frequency range while maintaining the general robustness, with a formulation that also seeks to preserve the simplicity of the SCA approach.
We Go Signaling Into the Night: Describing an Echolocation Signal of an Unknown Beaked Whale (Cetacea; Ziphiidae)off West Africa (PDF)
Runte, K.L., K.A. Kowarski, J.J.-Y. Delarue, E.E. Maxner, D. Hedgeland, S.B. Martin
Marine Mammal Science 41(3): e70002 (2025)
DOI: 10.1111/mms.70002
Runte, K.L., K.A. Kowarski, J.J.-Y. Delarue, E.E. Maxner, D. Hedgeland, S.B. Martin
Marine Mammal Science 41(3): e70002 (2025)
DOI: 10.1111/mms.70002
Beaked whales (Cetacea; Ziphiidae), one of the most diverse families of cetaceans, can be identified by species-specific, frequency-modulated echolocation signals. Of the 24 known species of beaked whales, over half have been assigned a unique signal type. A novel echolocation pulse belonging to an unknown beaked whale species was recorded off West Africa (Beaked Whale of West Africa, BWWA), along the coast of the Democratic Republic of São Tomé and Príncipe. Bottom-mounted autonomous acoustic recorders (sampling rate of 375 kHz) were deployed from October 2018 to August 2019 (294 recording days) at depths of 450–600 m. An automated detector-classifier created to identify BWWA (per file Precision of 1.00; Recall of 1.00)-guided manual validation. BWWA was present in all recording months and detected during local nighttime hours (98% of detections occurred during fully dark periods). BWWA had a 52.5 kHz median peak frequency, 55.4 kHz center frequency, 29.0 kHz −10 dB bandwidth, 843 μs duration, and 86 ms inter-pulse interval (IPI). While species identification remains unsolved for BWWA, spectral similarities to unidentified signals in the Pacific Ocean, BWC, and in the Gulf of Mexico, BWG, find that all three signals can be characterized by longer pulse durations and shorter IPIs.
Exploring offshore particle motion soundscapes
Martin, S.B. and M. Siderius.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 159(1): 300–314 (2026)
Jones, I.T., S.B. Martin, and J.L. Miksis-Olds
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 157: 149–168 (2025)
Fishes and aquatic invertebrates utilize acoustic particle motion for hearing, and some additionally detect sound pressure. Yet, few underwater soundscapes studies report particle motion, which is often assumed to scale predictably with pressure in offshore habitats. This relationship does not always exist for low frequencies or near reflective boundaries. This study compared particle motion and sound pressure from hydrophone arrays near the seafloor at six sites on the U.S. Mid and South Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf and assessed predictability of sound pressure and particle motion levels by environmental indicators (wind, vessels, temperature, currents). Unidentified fish sounds (100–750 Hz) had particle motion magnitudes 4.8–12.6 dB greater than those predicted from single hydrophone (pressure) measurements, indicating that these sounds were received in the near field. Excess particle motion attributed to hydrodynamic flow noise (<100 Hz) was also present at all sites. Most sounds (25th–75th percentile) from other sources received in the far field (vessels, mammals), had measured particle motion within ±3 dB of that predicted from single hydrophone measurements. The results emphasize for offshore soundscapes the importance of particle motion measurement for short-time (1 min) and near field signals, and that pressure measurement is sufficient for long-term (1 year) predictive modeling.
Techniques for modeling ocean soundscapes: Detailed description for wind contributions (PDF)
Siderius, M., M.A. Ainslie, J. Gebbie, A. Schafke, N. R. Chapman, S.B. Martin, and K.L. Gemba
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 156(5): 3446–3458 (2024)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0034236
Siderius, M., M.A. Ainslie, J. Gebbie, A. Schafke, N. R. Chapman, S.B. Martin, and K.L. Gemba
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 156(5): 3446–3458 (2024)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0034236
Wind over the ocean creates breaking waves that generate air-filled bubbles, which radiate underwater sound. This wind-generated sound is a significant component of the ocean soundscape, and models are essential for understanding and predicting its impact. Models for predicting sound pressure level (SPL) from wind have been studied for many years. However, the terminology and definitions behind modeling approaches have not been unified, and ambiguity has led to differences in predicted SPL. The 2022 Ambient Sound Modeling Workshop was organized to compare ambient sound modeling approaches from different researchers. The main goal of the workshop was to quantify differences in predicted SPL and related quantities for different approaches and, to the extent possible, determine the cause of the differences for a specific, well-defined scenario. Results revealed a variation of approximately 6 dB across different research groups, with differences reaching up to 10 dB in some cases compared to the benchmark results described in this paper. These variations stemmed from differing methodologies and underlying assumptions. In this paper, step-by-step guidance is given for modeling SPL due to wind. The workshop test case will be described, and results from the modeling approaches described here will be compared with those from the workshop participants.
Verifying models of the underwater soundscape from wind and ships with benchmark scenario (PDF)
Martin, S.B., M. Siderius, M.A. Ainslie, M.B. Halvorsen, L. Hatch, M.K. Prior, D. Brooker, J. Caplinger, C. Erbe, J. Gebbie, K. D. Heaney, A.O. MacGillivray, M. Matthews, V.O. Oppeneer, A. Schafke, R.P. Schoeman, and H.O. Sertlek
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 156(5): 3422–3438 (2024)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0026597
Martin, S.B., M. Siderius, M.A. Ainslie, M.B. Halvorsen, L. Hatch, M.K. Prior, D. Brooker, J. Caplinger, C. Erbe, J. Gebbie, K. D. Heaney, A.O. MacGillivray, M. Matthews, V.O. Oppeneer, A. Schafke, R.P. Schoeman, and H.O. Sertlek
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 156(5): 3422–3438 (2024)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0026597
Models of the underwater acoustic soundscape are important for evaluating the effects of human generated sounds on marine life. The performance of models can be validated against measurements or verified against each other for consistency. A verification workshop was held to compare models that predict the soundscape from wind and vessels and estimate detection ranges for a submerged target. Eight modeling groups participated in the workshop which predicted sound levels with observation windows of 1 min and 1 km2. Substantial differences were found in how modelers computed the propagation losses for decidecade bands and estimated the source level of wind. Further investigations resulted in recommendations on best practices. Choices of temporal and spatial modeling resolution affected the estimates of metrics proportional to total sound energy more than distributions of sound pressure level. Deeper receivers were less sensitive to these parameters than shallow ones. A temporal resolution of 1 min and spatial resolution of 100 m is recommended. Models that follow the recommendations will yield similar results. The detection range of underwater targets is highly variable when the ambient noise depends on moving noise sources. Future work to verify models against data and understand model uncertainty is recommended.
Subtle shift in depth distribution of fish within the impact range of seismic surveying along a continental slope
Martin, S.B. and M. Siderius.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 159(1): 300–314 (2026)
Hynes, H., K.Q. Nguyen, M. Geoffroy, S.B. Martin, and C.J. Morris
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
The impact of an industry-based 3D seismic airgun survey on fish and zooplankton was investigated on offshore commercial fishing grounds in Newfoundland and Labrador. Seismic surveying was conducted for 100 consecutive days during summer 2021. A seabed moored autonomous multichannel acoustic recorder measured sound levels while a wideband autonomous transceiver equipped with 38 and 333 kHz transducers measured fish and zooplankton backscatter in the water column. The distance between the seismic survey vessel and the instruments ranged from 0 to 152 km and was tracked continuously. Fish between depths of 50 and 350 m exhibited a response to seismic surveying, descending to greater depths when the seismic vessel was within 60 km and when average sound pressure levels were >122 dB re 1 μPa2. Conversely, no discernible effect on zooplankton abundance or behavior was measured between 250 and 340 m depths. These findings suggest that the effects of seismic surveying in offshore environments are mainly impacting fish behaviour when sound levels are high, and impacts were observed at greater horizontal distances than previously reported.
Range versus frequency averaging of underwater propagation loss for soundscape modeling (PDF)
Zykov, M.M., and S.B. Martin
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 156(5): 3439–3445 (2024)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0030475
Zykov, M.M., and S.B. Martin
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 156(5): 3439–3445 (2024)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0030475
Guidance on efficient methods is needed for the practical application of modeling the sound field from broadband sources such as vessels, seismic surveys, and construction activities. These sound field models are employed for estimating how changes in the soundscape will affect marine life. For efficiency, acoustic propagation modeling is often performed in bands (decidecade or 1/3-octave), where propagation loss modeled for central frequency is assumed to represent an average propagation loss in the band. This shortcut comes at the expense of accuracy, which can be rectified by averaging the propagation loss across many frequencies in the band. Alternately, the equivalence of range and frequency averaging was shown by Harrison and Harrison [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 1314–1317 (1995)]. However, when and how to apply range averaging required further investigations. A simple environment with a flat sandy bottom and an isovelocity water-column sound speed profile was considered to test the agreement between the range and frequency averages for decidecade bands typically considered in soundscape modelling (10–1000 Hz). The optimal range smoothing window is a Gaussian window with a width of 10%–16% of the range from the source that switches to a width fixed beyond 20 km distance from the source.
Sound emissions from Ultrasonic Antifouling equipment (PDF)
Martin, S.B., A.O. MacGillivray, J.D. Wood, K.B. Trounce, D.J. Tollit, K. Angadi
The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life (2024)
Martin, S.B., A.O. MacGillivray, J.D. Wood, K.B. Trounce, D.J. Tollit, K. Angadi
The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life (2024)
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-50256-9_102
The Vancouver-Fraser Port Authority-led Enhanced Cetacean Habitat and Observation (ECHO) Program has managed underwater listening stations (ULSs) on the approach to the Port of Vancouver since 2015, measuring the sound levels generated by thousands of vessels. Since 2017, these systems have measured at or above a 128 kHz sampling rate. Anomalously high sound levels were observed in 212 of the measured ships signatures at frequencies typically associated with navigational, fisheries, and scientific sonars. Sixty-one of these detections were found to originate from a novel continuous sound source in the 20–30 kHz frequency range. During a separate underwater noise monitoring program, a similar high-frequency continuous sound source was identified proximate to a berthed vessel. The vessel engineer identified it as an ultrasonic antifouling system. The sounds from these systems are detectable at 4–6 km from the vessels in deep water. The measurements indicate that echolocation by lower-frequency delphinids, such as killer whales, may be completely masked when a ship is 3 km away and that porpoises flee from the source at distances of 1.5 km. In shallow waters, a porpoise 70 m from the source is predicted to experience temporary threshold shift (TTS) after 1–2 s, and permanent threshold shift (PTS) after 200 s. It is recommended that use of these systems be restricted or prohibited when there is a possibility of exposing marine mammals to potentially harmful sound levels.
Recommendations on bioacoustical metrics relevant for regulating exposure to anthropogenic underwater sound (PDF)
Klaus, L., A.O. MacGillivray, M.B. Halvorsen, M.A. Ainslie, D. G. Zeddies, and J. A. Sisneros
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 156(4): 2508–2526 (2024)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0028586
Klaus, L., A.O. MacGillivray, M.B. Halvorsen, M.A. Ainslie, D. G. Zeddies, and J. A. Sisneros
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 156(4): 2508–2526 (2024)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0028586
Metrics to be used in noise impact assessment must integrate the physical acoustic characteristics of the sound field with relevant biology of animals. Several metrics have been established to determine and regulate underwater noise exposure to aquatic fauna. However, recent advances in understanding cause-effect relationships indicate that additional metrics are needed to fully describe and quantify the impact of sound fields on aquatic fauna. Existing regulations have primarily focused on marine mammals and are based on the dichotomy of sound types as being either impulsive or non-impulsive. This classification of sound types, however, is overly simplistic and insufficient for adequate impact assessments of sound on animals. It is recommended that the definition of impulsiveness be refined by incorporating kurtosis as an additional parameter and applying an appropriate conversion factor. Auditory frequency weighting functions, which scale the importance of particular sound frequencies to account for an animal's sensitivity to those frequencies, should be applied. Minimum phase filters are recommended for calculating weighted sound pressure. Temporal observation windows should be reported as signal duration influences its detectability by animals. Acknowledging that auditory integration time differs across species and is frequency dependent, standardized temporal integration windows are proposed for various signal types.
Source and propagation modelling scenarios for environmental impact assessment: Model verification (PDF)
Ainslie, M. A., R.M. Laws, M.J. Smith, A.O. MacGillivray
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 156(3): 1489–1508 (2024)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0028135
Ainslie, M. A., R.M. Laws, M.J. Smith, A.O. MacGillivray
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 156(3): 1489–1508 (2024)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0028135
Evaluation of possible effects of underwater sound on aquatic life requires quantification of the sound field. A marine sound source and propagation modelling workshop took place in June 2022, whose objectives were to facilitate the evaluation of source and propagation models and to identify relevant metrics for environmental impact assessment. The scope of the workshop included model verification (model-model comparison) and model validation (model-measurement comparison) for multiple sources, including airguns, a low-frequency multi-beam echo sounder, and a surface vessel. Several verification scenarios were specified for the workshop; these are described herein.
Modeling the underwater sound of floating offshore windfarms in the Central Mediterranean Sea (PDF)
Baldachini, M., R.D.J. Burns, G. Buscaino, E. Papale, R. Racca, M.A. Wood, and F. Pace
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 12(9): 1495 (2024)
DOI: 10.3390/jmse12091495
Baldachini, M., R.D.J. Burns, G. Buscaino, E. Papale, R. Racca, M.A. Wood, and F. Pace
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 12(9): 1495 (2024)
DOI: 10.3390/jmse12091495
In the shift toward sustainable energy production, offshore wind power has experienced notable expansion. Several projects to install floating offshore wind farms in European waters, ranging from a few to hundreds of turbines, are currently in the planning stage. The underwater operational sound generated by these floating turbines has the potential to affect marine ecosystems, although the extent of this impact remains underexplored. This study models the sound radiated by three planned floating wind farms in the Strait of Sicily (Italy), an area of significant interest for such developments. These wind farms vary in size (from 250 MW to 2800 MW) and environmental characteristics, including bathymetry and seabed substrates. Propagation losses were modeled in one-third-octave bands using JASCO Applied Sciences’ Marine Operations Noise Model, which is based on the parabolic equation method, combined with the BELLHOP beam-tracing model. Two sound speed profiles, corresponding to winter and summer, were applied to simulate seasonal variations in sound propagation. Additionally, sound from an offshore supply ship was incorporated with one of these wind farms to simulate maintenance operations. Results indicate that sound from operating wind farms could reach a broadband sound pressure level (Lp) of 100 dB re 1 µPa as far as 67 km from the wind farm. Nevertheless, this sound level is generally lower than the ambient sound in areas with intense shipping traffic. The findings are discussed in relation to local background sound levels and current guidelines and regulations. The implications for environmental management include the need for comprehensive monitoring and mitigation strategies to protect marine ecosystems from potential acoustic disturbances.
Regional soundscape modeling of the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf (PDF)
Heaney, K.D., M. Ainslie, J. Murray, A.J. Heaney, J. Miksis-Olds, B. Martin
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 156, 378-390 (2024)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0026476
Heaney, K.D., M. Ainslie, J. Murray, A.J. Heaney, J. Miksis-Olds, B. Martin
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 156, 378-390 (2024)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0026476
The ocean soundscape is a complex superposition of sound from natural and anthropogenic sources. Recent advances in acoustic remote sensing and marine bioacoustics have highlighted how animals use their soundscape and how the background sound levels are influenced by human activities. In this paper, developments in computational ocean acoustics, remote sensing, and oceanographic modeling are combined to generate modelled sound fields at multiple scales in time and space. Source mechanisms include surface shipping, surface wind, and wave fields. A basin scale model is presented and applied to the United States Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). For model-data comparison at a single hydrophone location, the model is run for a single receiver position. Environmental and source model uncertainty is included in the site-specific modeling of the soundscape. An inversion of the local sediment type is made for a set of sites in the OCS. After performing this inversion, the qualitative comparison of the modelled sound pressure level (SPL) time series and observed SPL is excellent. The quantitative differences in the mean root mean square error between the model and data is less than 3 dB for most sites and frequencies above 90 Hz.
Three-dimensional modelling of underwater noise produced by a bulk carrier vessel and estimation of its environmental impact (PDF)
Petrov, S.P, A.G. Tyshchenko, and A.O. MacGillivray
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 155 (6): 3702–3714 (2024)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0026238
Petrov, S.P, A.G. Tyshchenko, and A.O. MacGillivray
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 155 (6): 3702–3714 (2024)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0026238
This study presents the results of three-dimensional (3D) propagation modeling of noise from a transiting bulk carrier vessel. In the simulated scenario, the surface vessel is moving past a bottom-mounted hydrophone system. Sound levels are estimated in decidecade frequency bands as the vessel transits past the hydrophone, and the simulation results are compared against real measured data. The modelling is performed using the program AMPLE, which is based on the wide-angle mode parabolic equation theory for simulating 3D broadband acoustic fields in a shallow sea. The model is used to investigate the effect of 3D phenomena on the surface vessel sound propagation. It is shown that an inaccuracy of the noise simulation associated with the use of a two-dimensional model can be as high as 7–10 dB for certain distances and for frequency bands over which a major part of the source energy is distributed. An approach to the selection of data-adjusted media parameters based on the Bayesian optimization is suggested, and the influence of the various parameters on the sound levels is discussed.
Acoustic occurrence of beaked whales off eastern Canada, 2015–2017 (PDF)
Delarue, J.J.-Y., H.B. Moors-Murphy, K.A. Kowarski, E.E. Maxner, G.E. Davis, J.E. Stanistreet, and S.B. Martin
Endangered Species Research 53: 439–466 (2024)
DOI: 10.3354/esr01314.
Delarue, J.J.-Y., H.B. Moors-Murphy, K.A. Kowarski, E.E. Maxner, G.E. Davis, J.E. Stanistreet, and S.B. Martin
Endangered Species Research 53: 439–466 (2024)
DOI: 10.3354/esr01314.
Several beaked whale species occur off eastern Canada. However, except for the northern bottlenose whale (NBW; Hyperoodon ampullatus), their distribution and annual occurrence remain largely unknown, which complicates management efforts to assess the status of poorly known species and effectively protect those species considered at risk. The main objective of this paper is to provide a year-round and pluriannual description of the minimum acoustic occurrence of the NBW, Sowerby’s (SBW; Mesoplodon bidens), Cuvier’s (CBW; Ziphius cavirostris), True’s (TBW; M. mirus) and Gervais’ (GBW; M. europaeus) beaked whales. Twenty-five acoustic recorders were deployed off eastern Canada between May 2015 and November 2017. Beaked whale echolocation clicks were detected using a combination of automated detectors and manual validation at 12 of these stations. Detections were generally restricted to deep continental slope waters. All detected species occurred in the southern part of the study area (off the Scotian Shelf and southern Grand Banks), while only NBWs were detected at the northern edge, off southern Labrador. Clicks identified as TBW or GBW were restricted to, but occurred annually in, the southern areas. All other species were present, at least seasonally, east and north of the Grand Banks. NBWs occurred every day in the Gully Canyon, where SBWs also occurred regularly. While these results should be interpreted as minimum species presence and considered with regards to detector performance, they provide important information regarding beaked whales’ use of areas off eastern Canada where these species have generally received no or very limited monitoring effort.
Mapping past and future shipping noise in European seas (PDF)
Recca, R., M.A. Ainslie, J. Bosschers, M. Hermans, T. Lloyd, A.O. MacGillivray, F. Pace, M. Schuster, O. Sertlek and M. Wood
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 155, A199 (2024)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0027298
Recca, R., M.A. Ainslie, J. Bosschers, M. Hermans, T. Lloyd, A.O. MacGillivray, F. Pace, M. Schuster, O. Sertlek and M. Wood
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 155, A199 (2024)
DOI: 10.1121/10.0027298
Against the backdrop of a steadily increasing demand for sea transport of goods and people, the development of a reliable marine shipping soundscape model is an essential planning requirement to assess the effect on ocean noise of operational and technological changes aimed at mitigating the environmental impact of the shipping sector. The NAVISON (Navis Sonus) project, conducted with the support of the European Maritime Safety Agency, employs a specially developed parametric vessel source model with the objective of producing shipping sound maps in European seas for past, present, and potential future conditions over a time span from 2016 to 2050. The source model is combined with historical ship tracking data from the automated identification system (AIS), or projected shipping densities and mitigation scenarios, to calculate spatial ship noise emissions data for input to a sound mapping tool. The mapping tool computes underwater sound propagation using the parabolic-equation method, drawing upon ocean-scale databases of bathymetric, oceanographic, and sediment properties. Project outputs are provided as map layers of sound pressure level and sound energy according to vessel type, season, region, year, and operational conditions; from these layers, maps can be generated for user-specified combinations of mitigation measures. Maps are presented in two frequency bands (centred at 63 Hz and 125 Hz) selected for assessing Good Environmental Status in the context of the European Union’s Marine Strategy Framework Directive.