Journal Publications
Monitoring the gray whale sound exposure mitigation zone and estimating acoustic transmission during a 4-D seismic survey, Sakhalin Island, Russia (PDF)
Racca, R., M. Austin, A. Rutenko, and K. Bröker
Endangered Species Research 29: 131-146 (2015)
DOI: 10.3354/esr00703
Racca, R., M. Austin, A. Rutenko, and K. Bröker
Endangered Species Research 29: 131-146 (2015)
DOI: 10.3354/esr00703
A seismic survey conducted in the proximity of the nearshore feeding grounds of gray whales Eschrichtius robustus off northeastern Sakhalin Island, Russia, required the development of a comprehensive monitoring and mitigation plan. Prior to the execution of the seismic survey, the sound levels from the airgun array source were modelled for all seismic acquisition lines. This yielded estimated shoreward boundaries for an assumed disturbance threshold of 156 dB re 1 µPa^2-s sound exposure level (SEL) that allowed an assessment of which lines would require more stringent mitigation. To enable prediction of the sound front under variable propagation conditions, a set of acoustic footprints with a realistic range of parameters was pre-computed. In the field, an acoustic monitoring network of 9 bottom-deployed stations with tethered radio buoys transmitted full waveform data to a shore-based monitoring post. The signals were processed to yield pulse levels for comparison to the model predictions. The appropriate footprint was selected on the basis of the pulse levels received during the initial minute of a seismic line and communicated to observation teams. To further ensure the sustained accuracy of the selected footprint during a line acquisition, the modelled levels were compared in real time to the measured readings as the source moved past the line of monitoring stations; they were consistently found to match the incoming received sound levels within an accepted tolerance of 3 dB. This selection approach resulted in the best available estimation of acoustic exposure even through significant temporal changes in the hydrological conditions.
Marine mammal audibility of selected shallow-water survey sources (PDF)
MacGillivray, A.O., R. Racca, and Z. Li
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135: EL35-EL40 (2014)
DOI: 10.1121/1.4838296
MacGillivray, A.O., R. Racca, and Z. Li
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135: EL35-EL40 (2014)
DOI: 10.1121/1.4838296
Most attention about the acoustic effects of marine survey sound sources on marine mammals has focused on airgun arrays, with other common sources receiving less scrutiny. Sound levels above hearing threshold (sensation levels) were modeled for six marine mammal species and seven different survey sources in shallow water. The model indicated that odontocetes were most likely to hear sounds from mid-frequency sources (fishery, communication, and hydrographic systems), mysticetes from low-frequency sources (sub-bottom profiler and airguns), and pinnipeds from both mid- and low-frequency sources. High-frequency sources (side-scan and multibeam) generated the lowest estimated sensation levels for all marine mammal species groups.
Song of the burbot: Under-ice acoustic signalling by a freshwater gadoid fish
Cott, P.A., A.D. Hawkins, D.G. Zeddies, B. Martin, T. Johnston, J.D. Reist, J.M. Gunn, and D.M. Higgs
Journal of Great Lakes Research 40: 435-440 (2014)
Cott, P.A., A.D. Hawkins, D.G. Zeddies, B. Martin, T. Johnston, J.D. Reist, J.M. Gunn, and D.M. Higgs
Journal of Great Lakes Research 40: 435-440 (2014)
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2014.02.017
Burbot (Lota lota) are northern freshwater gadoid fish that spawn under ice-cover, making their reproductive behavior largely unknown to science. Some members of the cod family vocalize as part of their mating system. These calls are produced by rapidly contracting drumming muscles on their swim bladders. Burbot also possess drumming muscles, like their marine counterparts, which may enable them to vocalize. To assess the potential for burbot to make calls, pre-spawning adult burbot were collected and placed in a large under-ice enclosure in Great Slave Lake, Northwest Territories, Canada, along with a recorder that monitored low frequency sound over their spawning period. The recorded acoustic data revealed that burbot called coincident with the onset of their spawning period and that the call signatures were stereotypical of swim bladder generated vocalizations made by other gadoid fishes. Burbot showed a wide repertoire of calls, from slow knocks to fast buzzing, similar to the closely related haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus). Although never-before documented, calling by fish under ice-cover is likely an important part of the mating system of under-ice spawning gadoids because light limitation would reduce the usefulness of visual cues. These under-ice communications may be affected by anthropogenic noise from increasing resource development in northern regions.
Acoustic occurrence and affiliation of fin whales detected in the Northeastern Chukchi Sea, July to October 2007–10 (PDF)
Delarue, J.J.-Y., B. Martin, D.E. Hannay, and C.L. Berchok
Arctic 66: 159-172 (2013)
DOI: 10.14430/arctic4287
Delarue, J.J.-Y., B. Martin, D.E. Hannay, and C.L. Berchok
Arctic 66: 159-172 (2013)
DOI: 10.14430/arctic4287
Fin whales are common throughout the North Pacific region, particularly in the Gulf of Alaska and the Bering Sea, even though these areas were heavily depleted by decades of whaling. Whalers also took fin whales in the southwestern Chukchi Sea, but only five sightings have been reported for the entire Chukchi Sea in the past 30 years. Large-scale arrays consisting of 26 – 44 bottom-mounted acoustic recorders were deployed in the northeastern Chukchi Sea from July to October in 2007 to 2010. Fin whales were detected off Cape Lisburne and Point Lay in 2007, 2009, and 2010. Large interannual variations in the number of acoustic detections may be related to environmental conditions. Calls detected during summer months consisted primarily of irregular sequences. Stereotyped sequences, called songs, were also detected at the end of the recording period in 2007 and 2010. Their structure matched that of one of the songs recorded in the Bering Sea, suggesting that only one of the stocks occurring in the Bering Sea extends its range into the northeastern Chukchi Sea. These detections currently represent the northernmost fin whale records in the North Pacific region.
Marine mammal acoustic detections in the northeastern Chukchi Sea, September 2007–July 2011
Hannay, D.E., J. Delarue, X. Mouy, B.S. Martin, D. Leary, J.N. Oswald, and J. Vallarta
Continental Shelf Research 67: 127-146 (2013)
Hannay, D.E., J. Delarue, X. Mouy, B.S. Martin, D. Leary, J.N. Oswald, and J. Vallarta
Continental Shelf Research 67: 127-146 (2013)
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2013.07.009
Several cetacean and pinniped species use the northeastern Chukchi Sea as seasonal or year-round habitat. This area has experienced pronounced reduction in the extent of summer sea ice over the last decade, as well as increased anthropogenic activity, particularly in the form of oil and gas exploration. The effects of these changes on marine mammal species are presently unknown. Autonomous passive acoustic recorders were deployed over a wide area of the northeastern Chukchi Sea off the coast of Alaska from Cape Lisburne to Barrow, at distances from 8 km to 200 km from shore: up to 44 each summer and up to 8 each winter. Acoustic data were acquired at 16 kHz continuously during summer and on a duty cycle of 40 or 48 min within each 4-h period during winter. Recordings were analyzed manually and using automated detection and classification systems to identify calls.
Underwater noise from offshore oil production vessels (PDF)
Erbe, C., R.D. McCauley, C.R. McPherson, and A. Gavrilov
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133: EL465-EL470 (2013)
DOI: 10.1121/1.4802183
Erbe, C., R.D. McCauley, C.R. McPherson, and A. Gavrilov
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133: EL465-EL470 (2013)
DOI: 10.1121/1.4802183
Underwater acoustic recordings of six Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) vessels moored off Western Australia are presented. Monopole source spectra were computed for use in environmental impact assessments of underwater noise. Given that operations on the FPSOs varied over the period of recording, and were sometimes unknown, the authors present a statistical approach to noise level estimation. No significant or consistent aspect dependence was found for the six FPSOs. Noise levels did not scale with FPSO size or power. The 5th, 50th (median), and 95th percentile source levels (broadband, 20 to 2500 Hz) were 188, 181, and 173 dB re 1 μPa @ 1 m, respectively.
Local acoustic particle motion guides sound-source localization behavior in the plainfin midshipman fish, Porichthys notatus (PDF)
Zeddies, D.G., R.R. Fay, M.D. Gray, P.W. Alderks, A. Acob, and J.A. Sisneros
Journal of Experimental Biology 215: 152-160 (2012)
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.064998
Zeddies, D.G., R.R. Fay, M.D. Gray, P.W. Alderks, A. Acob, and J.A. Sisneros
Journal of Experimental Biology 215: 152-160 (2012)
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.064998
Sound-source localization behavior was studied in the plainfin midshipman fish (Porichthys notatus) by making use of the naturally occurring phonotaxis response of gravid females to playback of the male's advertisement call. The observations took place outdoors in a circular concrete tank. A dipole sound projector was placed at the center of the tank and an 80–90 Hz tone (the approximate fundamental frequency to the male's advertisement call) was broadcast to gravid females that were released from alternative sites approximately 100 cm from the source. The phonotaxic responses of females to the source were recorded, analyzed and compared with the sound field. One release site was approximately along the vibratory axis of the dipole source, and the other was approximately orthogonal to the vibratory axis. The sound field in the tank was fully characterized through measurements of the sound pressure field using hydrophones and acoustic particle motion using an accelerometer. These measurements confirmed that the sound field was a nearly ideal dipole. When released along the dipole vibratory axis, the responding female fish took essentially straight paths to the source. However, when released approximately 90 deg to the source's vibratory axis, the responding females took highly curved paths to the source that were approximately in line with the local particle motion axes. These results indicate that the acoustic cues used by fish during sound-source localization include the axes of particle motion of the local sound field.
Mapping cumulative noise from shipping to inform marine spatial planning (PDF)
Erbe, C., A.O. MacGillivray, and R. Williams
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132(5): EL423-EL428 (2012)
DOI: 10.1121/1.4758779
Erbe, C., A.O. MacGillivray, and R. Williams
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132(5): EL423-EL428 (2012)
DOI: 10.1121/1.4758779
Including ocean noise in marine spatial planning requires predictions of noise levels on large spatiotemporal scales. Based on a simple sound transmission model and ship track data (Automatic Identification System, AIS), cumulative underwater acoustic energy from shipping was mapped throughout 2008 in the west Canadian Exclusive Economic Zone, showing high noise levels in critical habitats for endangered resident killer whales, exceeding limits of “good conservation status” under the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Error analysis proved that rough calculations of noise occurrence and propagation can form a basis for management processes, because spending resources on unnecessary detail is wasteful and delays remedial action.
Tracking of Pacific walruses in the Chukchi Sea using a single hydrophone (PDF)
Mouy, X., D.E. Hannay, M.M. Zykov, and B. Martin
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131: 1349-1358 (2012)
DOI: 10.1121/1.3675008
Mouy, X., D.E. Hannay, M.M. Zykov, and B. Martin
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131: 1349-1358 (2012)
DOI: 10.1121/1.3675008
The vocal repertoire of Pacific walruses includes underwater sound pulses referred to as knocks and bell-like calls. An extended acoustic monitoring program was performed in summer 2007 over a large region of the eastern Chukchi Sea using autonomous seabed-mounted acoustic recorders. Walrus knocks were identified in many of the recordings and most of these sounds included multiple bottom and surface reflected signals. This paper investigates the use of a localization technique based on relative multipath arrival times (RMATs) for potential behavior studies. First, knocks are detected using a semi-automated kurtosis-based algorithm. Then RMATs are matched to values predicted by a ray-tracing model. Walrus tracks with vertical and horizontal movements were obtained. The tracks included repeated dives between 4.0 m and 15.5 m depth and a deep dive to the sea bottom (53 m). Depths at which bell-like sounds are produced, average knock production rate and source levels estimates of the knocks were determined. Bell sounds were produced at all depths throughout the dives. Average knock production rates varied from 59 to 75 knocks/min. Average source level of the knocks was estimated to 177.6 ± 7.5 dB re 1 μPa peak @ 1 m.
Acoustic detections of beluga whales in the Northeastern Chukchi Sea, July 2007 to July 2008 (PDF)
Delarue, J.J.-Y., M. Laurinolli, and B. Martin
Arctic 64: 15-24 (2011)
DOI: 10.14430/arctic4076
Beluga calls were detected during two consecutive deployments of autonomous acoustic recorders in the northeastern Chukchi Sea. During the first deployment, calls were recorded between July and October 2007, primarily near the Barrow Canyon in July and August. During the second deployment, calls were detected in November 2007 off Point Lay and again between mid-April and June 2008 in a broad area 90 – 150 km off Point Lay and Wainwright, Alaska. The summer and fall 2007 detections were consistent with movement and residency patterns identified through satellite tagging studies. In the following spring, detections were recorded by four out of five monitoring stations for 19 to 37 consecutive days (depending on the station) between 13 April and 21 June 2008. These acoustic detections provide additional information about the timing and distribution of beluga migrations in the Chukchi Sea in spring.